CEOs are much likelier to lose their jobs over personal scandals than financial fraud. A study of 59 personal misconduct cases and over 300 financial scandals shows boards act quickly against CEOs whose private behaviour becomes public, while those implicated in financial wrongdoing often avoid dismissal, especially if the company is performing well. New insights from recent industry analysis highlight the growing scrutiny by regulators, governance challenges for boards, and significant financial and reputational consequences.
INSIGHTS
-
Boards are five times more likely to fire CEOs over personal misconduct than financial fraud, as personal scandals leave no room for excuses.
-
Examples include McDonald’s and Hewlett-Packard, whose CEOs were dismissed for personal conduct, despite strong business performance.
-
Financial scandals allow plausible deniability; boards may retain successful CEOs to avoid disrupting profits.
-
Succession responses differ: personal misconduct often leads to promoting insiders (signalling the issue is personal), while financial fraud triggers appointments of outsiders to reassure markets.
-
Regulator attention is increasing, viewing personal misconduct as an indicator of governance failures and holding boards accountable for oversight lapses.
-
Ethical lapses such as fraud, bribery, and insider dealing now drive nearly 40% of CEO involuntary exits in major companies.
-
Recent research links CEO contract duration and birthplace proximity to likelihood of misconduct, suggesting local ties may reduce financial wrongdoing.
-
Boards face not only fiduciary pressure but mounting reputational risks as public and market expectations rise for swift, appropriate action on misconduct.
ACTION ITEMS
▢ Make board policies explicit on how different forms of misconduct are addressed and reviewed.
▢ Enhance behavioural oversight and clarify CEO accountability frameworks.
▢ Prepare crisis protocols that define succession plans for integrity breaches.
▢ Foster board-regulator engagement for transparency and proactive governance.
▢ Use recent industry examples to train leadership and boards on ethical compliance.
Endnotes:
UFL study news.ufl.edu ⋮ CEO ethics industry trend consultancy.eu ⋮ Governance scrutiny aicd.com.au ⋮ Contract duration research ideas.repec.org
THE RISING COST OF CEO SCANDALS
-
Recent scandals involving CEOs (romantic relationships with staff, workplace misconduct) have led to large financial losses—an average of $226 million for shareholders per incident.
-
Over 90% of large companies now have hotlines for reporting misconduct. However, not all have robust investigation protocols, especially when accusations reach the executive level.
□ Companies must improve internal reporting and investigation systems to ensure accountability at the top.
□ Boards and senior leaders should apply the same transparency and rigour to self-governance as expected from their staff.
